Ice Watch smart 2.0 1.78 vs Motorola Moto Watch 40

What smart 2.0 1.78 does better (2) and where Moto Watch 40 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Ice Watch · 2024smart 2.0 1.78

8.5Score

2 advantages≈ $75

Higher score

Motorola · 2024Moto Watch 40

4.4Score

0 advantages≈ $65

8.7Display2.8

5.0Health tracking5.0

Why is smart 2.0 1.78 better than Moto Watch 40?

Moto Watch 40 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Only differences	Ice Watch smart 2.0 1.78≈ $758.5	Motorola Moto Watch 40≈ $654.4
Design & durability
Case size	—	46 mm
Weight	—	26 g
Thickness	—	10.2 mm
Height	—	45.9 mm
Width	—	30.8 mm
Case material	Stainless steel	—
Lens / cover glass	Mineralglas Mineralglas	—
Water resistance	5 ATM	—
Ingress protection	—	IP67
Water resistance (IPx)	—	IPx7
Water rating (maker)	50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM	—
Colours	—	Phantom Black, Black Rose Gold
Display
Screen size	1.7″	1.57″
Display technology	AMOLED	LCD
Panel	AMOLED	IPS LCD
AMOLED / OLED display	Yes	No
Resolution (width)	—	240 px
Resolution (height)	—	280 px
Pixel density	—	235 ppi
Refresh rate	—	60 Hz
Battery
Battery capacity	—	240 mAh
Wireless charging	—	No
Charged in 30 min	—	120%
Health sensors
Optical heart rate	Yes	Yes
Blood oxygen (SpO2)	Yes	Yes
ECG	Yes	—
Sleep tracking	Yes	—
Sensors	heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer	Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2
Sports & navigation
Built-in GPS	—	No
Connectivity
NFC payments	—	No
LTE (cellular)	—	No
eSIM	—	No
Bluetooth	5	5
Smart features
Speaker	—	No
Platform
Operating system	—	Moto Watch OS
Platform	—	Proprietary
Works with	iOS, Android	—