vs
8.7Display4.6
5.0Health tracking5.0
Why is smart 2.0 1.78 better than Watch S2?
- Screen size1.7″ vs 1.43″+19%
Why is Watch S2 better than smart 2.0 1.78?
Watch S2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 46 mm |
| Weight | — | 41 g |
| Thickness | — | 11 mm |
| Height | — | 46.5 mm |
| Width | — | 46.5 mm |
| Case material | Stainless steel | — |
| Lens / cover glass | Mineralglas Mineralglas | Scratch-resistant glass |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Water rating (maker) | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM | — |
| Colours | — | Gray, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.7″ | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 466 px |
| Pixel density | — | 326 ppi |
| Peak brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 380 mAh |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | No |
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Watch FEvsIce Watch smart 2.0 1.788.38.5
vsXiaomi Redmi Watch 6vsIce Watch smart 2.0 1.788.48.5
vsJoyroom Smartwatch JR-FV1vsIce Watch smart 2.0 1.789.78.5
vsAmazfit Active 2 (Round)vsIce Watch smart 2.0 1.788.68.5
vsHonor Watch X5vsIce Watch smart 2.0 1.788.38.5vs
Ice Watch smart 2.0 1.78vsXiaomi Smart Band 9 Pro8.58.8