vs
8.7Display7.9
5.0Health tracking5.0
Why is smart 2.0 1.78 better than Smart Band 8 Pro?
smart 2.0 1.78 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Smart Band 8 Pro better than smart 2.0 1.78?
- Screen size1.7″ vs 1.74″+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 46 mm |
| Weight | — | 22.5 g |
| Thickness | — | 10 mm |
| Height | — | 46 mm |
| Width | — | 33.4 mm |
| Case material | Stainless steel | Plastic / polymer |
| Lens / cover glass | Mineralglas Mineralglas | — |
| Strap material | — | Polyurethan |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM | 50 m / 5 ATM |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.7″ | 1.74″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 480 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 336 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 14 days |
| Battery capacity | — | 289 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | heart rate, accelerometer, ambient light |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| Smart features | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | Android, iOS |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Watch FEvsIce Watch smart 2.0 1.788.38.5
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Watch 6vsIce Watch smart 2.0 1.788.48.5
vs
Joyroom Smartwatch JR-FV1vsIce Watch smart 2.0 1.789.78.5
vs
Amazfit Active 2 (Round)vsIce Watch smart 2.0 1.788.68.5
vs
Honor Watch X5vsIce Watch smart 2.0 1.788.38.5
vs
Ice Watch smart 2.0 1.78vsXiaomi Smart Band 9 Pro8.58.8

