Ice Watch smart 2.0 1.78 vs Xiaomi Watch S1 Active

What smart 2.0 1.78 does better (1) and where Watch S1 Active wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Ice Watch · 2024smart 2.0 1.78

8.5Score

1 advantage≈ $75

Higher score

7.5Score

0 advantages≈ $85

8.7Display7.5

5.0Health tracking5.0

Why is smart 2.0 1.78 better than Watch S1 Active?

Watch S1 Active has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Only differences	Ice Watch smart 2.0 1.78≈ $758.5	Xiaomi Watch S1 Active≈ $857.5
Design & durability
Case size	—	46 mm
Thickness	—	11 mm
Height	—	46.5 mm
Width	—	47.3 mm
Case material	Stainless steel	Aluminium
Lens / cover glass	Mineralglas Mineralglas	—
Water resistance	5 ATM	5 ATM
Water rating (maker)	50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM	—
Colours	—	Moon White, Space Black, Ocean Blue
Display
Screen size	1.7″	1.43″
Display technology	AMOLED	AMOLED
Panel	AMOLED	AMOLED
AMOLED / OLED display	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	—	466 px
Resolution (height)	—	466 px
Pixel density	—	326 ppi
Refresh rate	—	60 Hz
Battery
Battery capacity	—	470 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Po
Health sensors
Optical heart rate	Yes	Yes
Blood oxygen (SpO2)	Yes	Yes
ECG	Yes	—
Sleep tracking	Yes	—
Sensors	heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer	Accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer, heart rate, SpO2
Sports & navigation
Built-in GPS	—	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite systems	—	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Barometric altimeter	—	Yes
Compass	—	Yes
Connectivity
NFC payments	—	Yes
LTE (cellular)	—	No
eSIM	—	No
Bluetooth	5	5.2
Smart features
Speaker	—	Yes
Platform
Operating system	—	Proprietary OS
Platform	—	Proprietary
Works with	iOS, Android	—