vs
9.2Display8.7
5.0Health tracking5.0
Why is Smart 3.0 better than Smart SQ 2.0 1.70?
- Screen size1.78″ vs 1.7″+5%
Why is Smart SQ 2.0 1.70 better than Smart 3.0?
Smart SQ 2.0 1.70 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 160 g |
| Lens / cover glass | Mineralglas Mineralglas | — |
| Strap material | — | Edelstahl |
| Water resistance | 3 ATM | — |
| Water rating (maker) | 30 m / 3 bar / 3 ATM | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.78″ | 1.7″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 368 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 448 px | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 3 days | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 210 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietär | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Ice Watch Smart 3.0vsGarett Prime Smartwatch Herren, Edelstahl, Gorilla Glassvs
Ice Watch Smart 3.0vsHiFuture Active Smartwatch 1,43" AMOLEDvs
Ice Watch Smart 3.0vsIce Watch ICE Smart ST 2.0vs
Ice Watch Smart 3.0vsVivo Watch 58.98.5
vsAmazfit Active 2 (Square)vsIce Watch Smart 3.08.98.9
vsAmazfit Bip 6vsIce Watch Smart 3.09.58.9