vs
9.3Display8.8
4.9Health tracking4.9
Why is Smart 3.0 better than Smart SQ 2.0 1.70?
- Screen size1.78″ vs 1.7″+5%
Why is Smart SQ 2.0 1.70 better than Smart 3.0?
Smart SQ 2.0 1.70 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 160 g |
| Lens / cover glass | Mineralglas Mineralglas | — |
| Strap material | — | Edelstahl |
| Water resistance | 3 ATM | — |
| Water rating (maker) | 30 m / 3 bar / 3 ATM | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.78″ | 1.7″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 368 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 448 px | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 3 days | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 210 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietär | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
