Why is R9 better than GSEMFW?
- Resolution (width)360 px vs 240 px+50%
- Battery capacity670 mAh vs 600 mAh+12%
Why is GSEMFW better than R9?
GSEMFW has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 47 mm |
| Weight | — | 38 g |
| Case material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Strap material | — | Silikon |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.43″ | — |
| Display technology | AMOLED | — |
| Panel | AMOLED | — |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 360 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 360 px | 240 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 2 days | 2 days |
| Battery capacity | 670 mAh | 600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sensors | — | heart rate |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Connectivity | ||
| LTE (cellular) | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | — | iOS, Android |
