vs
9.1Display9.4
Why is R9 better than moto watch ultra?
- Battery capacity670 mAh vs 550 mAh+22%
Why is moto watch ultra better than R9?
- Screen size1.43″ vs 1.5″+5%
- Resolution (width)360 px vs 466 px+29%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 46 mm |
| Weight | — | 51 g |
| Thickness | — | 12.1 mm |
| Height | — | 46 mm |
| Width | — | 46 mm |
| Case material | — | Stainless steel |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Gorilla Glas 3 |
| Water resistance | — | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM |
| Colours | Black | Anthracite |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.43″ | 1.5″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | OLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | OLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 360 px | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | 360 px | 466 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 2 days | 2 days |
| Battery capacity | 670 mAh | 550 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | — | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer, ambient light |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | Yes |
| LTE (cellular) | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 1 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| RAM | — | 2 GB |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | wear OS 6 |
| Platform | — | Wear OS |
| Works with | — | Android |
| Chipset | — | Qualcomm Snapdragon W5+ Gen 1 |
