Why is R9 better than Run?
- Screen size1.43″ vs 1.32″+8%
Why is Run better than R9?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)2 days vs 12 days6×
- Resolution (width)360 px vs 466 px+29%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 46 mm |
| Weight | — | 36 g |
| Thickness | — | 11.5 mm |
| Height | — | 46 mm |
| Width | — | 46 mm |
| Case material | — | Stainless steel |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Gorilla Glas |
| Strap material | — | Nylon textile |
| Water resistance | — | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.43″ | 1.32″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Always-on display | — | Yes |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 360 px | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | 360 px | 466 px |
| Pixel density | — | 353 ppi |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 2 days | 12 days |
| GPS battery life | — | 30 h |
| GPS battery life (dual-band) | — | 20 h |
| Battery capacity | 670 mAh | — |
| Battery type | Li-Po | rechargeable lithium-ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Temperature sensor | — | Yes |
| HRV tracking | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | — | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Barometric altimeter | — | Yes |
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | — | Yes |
| Sport profiles | — | 32 |
| Connectivity | ||
| LTE (cellular) | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 1 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Suunto OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | — | iOS, Android |
