vs
5.4Display2.8
5.0Health tracking5.0
Why is Smartwatch JR-FV1 better than Moto Watch 40?
- AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Moto Watch 40: No
- Resolution (width)466 px vs 240 px+94%
- Battery capacity300 mAh vs 240 mAh+25%
Why is Moto Watch 40 better than Smartwatch JR-FV1?
- Screen size1.32″ vs 1.57″+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 46 mm |
| Weight | — | 26 g |
| Thickness | — | 10.2 mm |
| Height | — | 45.9 mm |
| Width | — | 30.8 mm |
| Water resistance | 1 ATM | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Water rating (maker) | 10 m | — |
| Colours | Black | Phantom Black, Black Rose Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.32″ | 1.57″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | LCD |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 466 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 466 px | 280 px |
| Pixel density | — | 235 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 20 days | — |
| Battery life (hours) | 480 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 240 mAh |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 120% |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | — | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | No |
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | No |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Moto Watch OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
Related comparisons
vs
Amazfit Bip 6vsJoyroom Smartwatch JR-FV19.59.7vs
Joyroom Smartwatch JR-FV1vsIce Watch smart 2.0 1.789.78.5vs
Joyroom Smartwatch JR-FV1vsBea-Fon Watch 2019.79.2vs
Joyroom Smartwatch JR-FV1vsXiaomi Smart Band 9 Pro9.78.8vs
Joyroom Smartwatch JR-FV1vsXiaomi Smart Band 8 Pro9.79.0
vsAmazfit GTS 4 MinivsJoyroom Smartwatch JR-FV19.49.7