vs
6.7Display2.2
Why is GPS 2 2023 better than FW51?
- AMOLED / OLED displayYes · FW51: No
- Battery capacity1,100 mAh vs 130 mAh8.5×
- Screen size1.32″ vs 1.09″+21%
- Resolution (width)360 px vs 240 px+50%
Why is FW51 better than GPS 2 2023?
FW51 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 35 mm | — |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Water rating (maker) | 50 m | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.32″ | 1.09″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | — |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | No |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 360 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 360 px | 240 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 7 days |
| Battery capacity | 1,100 mAh | 130 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GPS, GALILEO | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| Platform | ||
| Chipset | — | Realtek RTK8762DK |
