vs
8.6Display8.4
9.1Health tracking4.9
Why is Lite 4 2026 better than Ticwatch Pro 3?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)5 days vs 3 days+67%
- Screen size1.85″ vs 1.4″+32%
- Thickness6 mm vs 12.2 mm2×
Why is Ticwatch Pro 3 better than Lite 4 2026?
- Resolution (width)390 px vs 454 px+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 41.9 g |
| Thickness | 6 mm | 12.2 mm |
| Height | — | 47 mm |
| Width | — | 48 mm |
| Case material | Aluminium | Stainless steel |
| Strap material | Silikon | Silikon |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.85″ | 1.4″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Always-on display | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 390 px | 454 px |
| Resolution (height) | 450 px | 454 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 5 days | 3 days |
| Battery capacity | — | 595 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | Yes | — |
| Skin temperature | Yes | — |
| HRV tracking | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | heart rate, SpO2, barometer, accelerometer, ambient light |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Barometric altimeter | — | Yes |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Wear OS by Google |
| Platform | — | Wear OS |
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
| Chipset | Jieli AC7013A | Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 4100 |
Related comparisons
vs
Motorola Moto Watch 2vsKnauermann Lite 4 2026vs
Knauermann Lite 4 2026vsLotus 50050vs
Knauermann Lite 4 2026vsLevowatch 42624628202208.99.1vs
Knauermann Lite 4 2026vsMaxcom FW48 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen 60gvs
Knauermann Lite 4 2026vsReflex Active Series 45 Smartwatch AMOLED8.99.6vs
Knauermann Lite 4 2026vsGarett Compass Smartwatch