vs
8.0Display2.2
9.4Health tracking4.9
Why is Pro 3 2025 Fan Edition rund better than FW51?
- AMOLED / OLED displayYes · FW51: No
- Screen size1.43″ vs 1.09″+31%
Why is FW51 better than Pro 3 2025 Fan Edition rund?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)5 days vs 7 days+40%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case material | Stainless steel | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.43″ | 1.09″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | — |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | No |
| Always-on display | Yes | — |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 240 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 5 days | 7 days |
| Battery capacity | — | 130 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | Yes | — |
| Skin temperature | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | — |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
| Chipset | — | Realtek RTK8762DK |
Related comparisons
vs
Knauermann Pro 3 2025 Fan Edition rundvsMibro Watch GS S Ceramic8.68.5
vs
Knauermann Pro 3 2025 Fan Edition rundvsHAMMER Watch 2
vs
Knauermann Pro 3 2025 Fan Edition rundvsPolice My.Avatar 2 Smartwatch Edelstahl AMOLED
vs
Knauermann Pro 3 2025 Fan Edition rundvsRadley RYS08-2088
vs
Casio GBD-300vsMaxcom FW51
vs
Knauermann GPS 2 2023vsMaxcom FW51
