vs
9.0Display8.1
Why is 4262462820220 better than 50050?
4262462820220 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is 50050 better than 4262462820220?
50050 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 47 mm |
| Case material | Stainless steel | — |
| Strap material | Silikon, Edelstahl | Edelstahl |
| Colours | Gold | Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.43″ | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 466 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 466 px | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 250 mAh | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| Skin temperature | — | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate | heart rate, temperature |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Mibro Watch GS ExplorervsLevowatch 42624628202208.68.9
vs
Levowatch 4262462820220vsPeers Hardy Series 29 AMOLED Smart Calling Watch
vs
Levowatch 4262462820220vsHAMMER Watch 2
vs
Levowatch 4262462820220vsMaxcom FW66 Iron R8.98.9
vs
Levowatch 4262462820220vsHama 90008.98.9
vs
Levowatch 4262462820220vsSector S-02

