vs
8.2Display8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
50050Ticwatch Pro 3
| 50050 | Ticwatch Pro 3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 46.7 mm | 48 mm | −1.3 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 50050 better than Ticwatch Pro 3?
- Screen size1.43″ vs 1.4″+2%
Why is Ticwatch Pro 3 better than 50050?
Ticwatch Pro 3 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 47 mm | — |
| Weight | — | 41.9 g |
| Thickness | — | 12.2 mm |
| Height | — | 47 mm |
| Width | — | 48 mm |
| Case material | — | Stainless steel |
| Strap material | Edelstahl | Silikon |
| Colours | Silver | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.43″ | 1.4″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | — | 454 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 454 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 3 days |
| Battery capacity | — | 595 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Skin temperature | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, temperature | heart rate, SpO2, barometer, accelerometer, ambient light |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Barometric altimeter | — | Yes |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Wear OS by Google |
| Platform | — | Wear OS |
| Chipset | — | Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 4100 |
