vs
2.0Build & durability8.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
R8851112001Moto Watch 100
| R8851112001 | Moto Watch 100 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 45 mm | 46 mm | −1 mm |
| Thickness | 13.3 mm | 11.9 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Weight | 150 g | 29 g | +121 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is R8851112001 better than Moto Watch 100?
R8851112001 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Moto Watch 100 better than R8851112001?
- Weight150 g vs 29 g5.2×
- Water resistance3 ATM vs 5 ATM+67%
- Thickness13.3 mm vs 11.9 mm+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 45 mm | 42 mm |
| Weight | 150 g | 29 g |
| Thickness | 13.3 mm | 11.9 mm |
| Height | — | 42 mm |
| Width | — | 46 mm |
| Case material | Stainless steel | Aluminium |
| Lens / cover glass | Mineralglas | — |
| Strap material | Leder | — |
| Water resistance | 3 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | 3 ATM | — |
| Colours | Black, Silver | Glacier Silver, Phantom Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | — | 1.3″ |
| Display technology | — | LCD |
| Panel | — | IPS LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | — | 360 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 360 px |
| Pixel density | — | 392 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 355 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GLONASS |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | No |
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | No |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Moto Watch OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
