vs
5.2Display9.7
Why is Eco Watch 3 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen better than GTS 4?
- Battery capacity280 mAh vs 260 mAh+8%
Why is GTS 4 better than Eco Watch 3 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen?
- Screen size1.32″ vs 1.94″+47%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 47 mm |
| Thickness | — | 8.7 mm |
| Case material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Strap material | — | Silikon |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.32″ | 1.94″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 466 px | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | 466 px | 466 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 7 days |
| Battery capacity | 280 mAh | 260 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | — | iOS, Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Motorola Moto WatchvsMaxcom Eco Watch 3 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen
vsOnePlus Watch 4vsMaxcom Eco Watch 3 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen
vsHuawei Watch 6 ProvsMaxcom Eco Watch 3 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen
vsCubot GT5vsMaxcom Eco Watch 3 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen
vs
Zeblaze GTS 3 ProvsZeblaze GTS 49.49.2vsHuawei Watch 6 ProvsZeblaze GTS 48.89.2