Why is Fit FW42 better than FW34?
- Battery capacity180 mAh vs 105 mAh+71%
Why is FW34 better than Fit FW42?
FW34 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 24 g |
| Thickness | — | 11 mm |
| Height | — | 43 mm |
| Width | — | 23 mm |
| Case material | Stainless steel | Aluminium |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 1 m |
| Colours | — | Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | — | 1.08″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT | TFT |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 7 days | — |
| Battery capacity | 180 mAh | 105 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5 | 4 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
