vs
Why is Fit FW42 better than Smart Band 9 Active?
Fit FW42 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Smart Band 9 Active better than Fit FW42?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)7 days vs 18 days2.6×
- Battery capacity180 mAh vs 300 mAh+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 46 mm |
| Weight | — | 16.5 g |
| Thickness | — | 10 mm |
| Case material | Stainless steel | — |
| Water resistance | — | 5 ATM |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | — | 1.47″ |
| Display technology | LCD | — |
| Panel | TFT | — |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | — | 320 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 172 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 7 days | 18 days |
| Battery capacity | 180 mAh | 300 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | Android, iOS |
