vs
6.2Display6.7
Why is FW48 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen 60g better than PSW 200?
FW48 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen 60g has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is PSW 200 better than FW48 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen 60g?
PSW 200 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 44 mm |
| Thickness | — | 9 mm |
| Strap material | — | Silikon |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.32″ | 1.32″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 390 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 390 px | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 12 days |
| Battery capacity | 200 mAh | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | — | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | SpO2 | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Motorola Moto Watch 2vsMaxcom FW48 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen 60g
vsAGM Legion 2025 RoundvsMaxcom FW48 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen 60g
vsKnauermann Lite 4 2026vsMaxcom FW48 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen 60g
vsReflex Active Series 54 SmartwatchvsMaxcom FW48 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen 60g
vsZeblaze Lily 2 Smartwatch 1,2" AMOLED DamenvsMaxcom FW48 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen 60g
vsZeblaze Vibe 8vsMaxcom FW48 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen 60g