vs
6.2Display9.5
Why is FW48 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen 60g better than Ares 3?
- Resolution (width)390 px vs 240 px+62%
Why is Ares 3 better than FW48 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen 60g?
- Screen size1.32″ vs 1.75″+33%
- Battery capacity200 mAh vs 380 mAh+90%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Thickness | — | 12.7 mm |
| Strap material | — | Silikon |
| Water resistance | — | 3 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 30 m / 3 bar / 3 ATM |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.32″ | 1.75″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 390 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 390 px | 296 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 3 days |
| Battery capacity | 200 mAh | 380 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | — | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | SpO2 | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | — | iOS, Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Motorola Moto Watch 2vsMaxcom FW48 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen 60g
vsAGM Legion 2025 RoundvsMaxcom FW48 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen 60g
vsKnauermann Lite 4 2026vsMaxcom FW48 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen 60g
vsReflex Active Series 54 SmartwatchvsMaxcom FW48 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen 60g
vsZeblaze Lily 2 Smartwatch 1,2" AMOLED DamenvsMaxcom FW48 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen 60g
vsZeblaze Vibe 8vsMaxcom FW48 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen 60g