Mibro GS Active2 vs Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra

What GS Active2 does better (0) and where Black Shark GS3 Ultra wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Mibro · 2025GS Active2

6.6Score

0 advantages≈ $110

6.9Score

1 advantage

Higher score

4.9Health tracking4.9

5.8Build & durability5.2

Why is GS Active2 better than Black Shark GS3 Ultra?

GS Active2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Only differences	Mibro GS Active2≈ $1106.6	Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra6.9
Design & durability
Case size	46 mm	—
Weight	39.9 g	—
Case material	—	Aluminium
Lens / cover glass	—	Corning Gorilla Glass
Water resistance	5 ATM	5 ATM
Ingress protection	—	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	—	IPx8
Military-grade (MIL-STD-810)	—	Yes
Colours	—	Black, Silver
Display
Screen size	1.32″	1.43″
Display technology	AMOLED	AMOLED
Panel	—	AMOLED
AMOLED / OLED display	—	Yes
Touchscreen	Yes	—
Resolution (width)	466 px	466 px
Resolution (height)	466 px	466 px
Pixel density	—	326 ppi
Peak brightness	—	1,000 nits
Refresh rate	—	60 Hz
Battery
Battery life (smartwatch mode)	20 days	—
Battery capacity	350 mAh	—
Health sensors
Optical heart rate	Yes	Yes
Blood oxygen (SpO2)	Yes	Yes
Sleep tracking	Yes	—
Sensors	—	Accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer, heart rate, SpO2
Sports & navigation
Built-in GPS	Yes	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite systems	—	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Barometric altimeter	—	Yes
Compass	—	Yes
Connectivity
NFC payments	—	Yes
LTE (cellular)	—	No
eSIM	—	No
Bluetooth	5.3	—
Smart features
Calls from the wrist	Yes	—
Speaker	—	Yes
Platform
Works with	Android, iOS	—