vs
6.9Display6.2
4.9Health tracking4.9
Why is Watch GS Active better than Watch GS Active2?
- Battery capacity400 mAh vs 350 mAh+14%
Why is Watch GS Active2 better than Watch GS Active?
Watch GS Active2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case material | — | Stainless steel |
| Lens / cover glass | Kunststoffglas | Kunststoffglas |
| Strap material | — | Silikon |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | 5 ATM | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | — | 1.32″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 466 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 20 days | 20 days |
| Battery capacity | 400 mAh | 350 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | GPS |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
Related comparisons
vs
Hama Watch 5010vsMibro Watch GS Active8.18.1
vs
Emporia Watch JOYvsMibro Watch GS Active
vs
myPhone AdventurevsMibro Watch GS Active8.18.1
vs
Mibro Watch GS ActivevsKsix mobile tech Titanium8.18.4
vs
Mibro Watch GS Active2vsPeers Hardy Series 29 AMOLED Smart Calling Watch
vs
Xcoast Siona 2 NanovsMibro Watch GS Active27.07.3
