vs
4.0Display7.7
2.5Smart features4.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto Watch 100Watch T1
| Moto Watch 100 | Watch T1 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 42 mm | 43.5 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Width | 46 mm | 43.5 mm | +2.5 mm |
| Thickness | 11.9 mm | 10.2 mm | +1.7 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto Watch 100 better than Watch T1?
- Battery capacity355 mAh vs 228 mAh+56%
Why is Watch T1 better than Moto Watch 100?
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Moto Watch 100: Yes
- NFC paymentsNo · Moto Watch 100: Yes
- Thickness11.9 mm vs 10.2 mm+17%
- Pixel density392 ppi vs 453 ppi+16%
- Resolution (width)360 px vs 416 px+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 42 mm | 44 mm |
| Weight | 29 g | — |
| Thickness | 11.9 mm | 10.2 mm |
| Height | 42 mm | 43.5 mm |
| Width | 46 mm | 43.5 mm |
| Case material | Aluminium | — |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Colours | Glacier Silver, Phantom Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.3″ | 1.3″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 360 px | 416 px |
| Resolution (height) | 360 px | 416 px |
| Pixel density | 392 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 355 mAh | 228 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, SpO2 | Accelerometer, heart rate |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GLONASS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | Yes |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | No | No |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Moto Watch OS | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
