vs
5.7Display9.6
5.0Health tracking8.2
6.4Sports & outdoor3.1
6.5Smart features7.9
6.6Build & durability7.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto WatchGalaxy Watch9
| Moto Watch | Galaxy Watch9 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 47 mm | 46 mm | +1 mm |
| Width | 47 mm | 43.7 mm | +3.3 mm |
| Thickness | 12 mm | 8.6 mm | +3.4 mm |
| Weight | 35 g | 34 g | +1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto Watch better than Galaxy Watch9?
Moto Watch has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Galaxy Watch9 better than Moto Watch?
- LTE (cellular)No · Moto Watch: Yes
- eSIMNo · Moto Watch: Yes
- Weight35 g vs 34 g+3%
- Screen size1.43″ vs 1.47″+3%
- Thickness12 mm vs 8.6 mm+40%
- Resolution (width)464 px vs 480 px+3%
- Pixel density317 ppi vs 327 ppi+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 47 mm | 46 mm |
| Weight | 35 g | 34 g |
| Thickness | 12 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 47 mm | 46 mm |
| Width | 47 mm | 43.7 mm |
| Case material | — | Aluminium |
| Sapphire crystal | — | Yes |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Sapphire crystal |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM |
| Military-grade (MIL-STD-810) | — | Yes |
| Colours | Volcanic Ash, Silver | Graphite, Silver, Cream |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.43″ | 1.47″ |
| Display technology | OLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | OLED | Super AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 464 px | 480 px |
| Resolution (height) | 464 px | 480 px |
| Pixel density | 317 ppi | 327 ppi |
| Peak brightness | — | 3,000 nits |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 445 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Charging | — | kabellos, magnetisches Ladekabel, magnetische Ladeschale |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | — | Yes |
| Skin temperature | — | Yes |
| Temperature sensor | — | Yes |
| HRV tracking | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, SpO2, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, barometer, altimeter, compass, SpO2, temperature (skin), BioActive, antioxidant index |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Barometric altimeter | — | Yes |
| Compass | Yes | Yes |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | Yes | Yes |
| LTE (cellular) | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 6 |
| Smart features | ||
| Calls from the wrist | — | Yes |
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistant | — | Yes |
| Music on the watch | — | Yes |
| Storage | — | 32 GB |
| RAM | — | 2 GB |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Unspecified | Android Wear OS 7 |
| Platform | Proprietary | Android |
| Works with | — | Android |
| Chipset | — | Snapdragon SW6100 Wear Elite |
Related comparisons
vs
Vivo Watch GT2vsMotorola Moto Watch
vs
Garmin Venu X1vsMotorola Moto Watch7.17.2
vs
Motorola Moto WatchvsIce Watch ICE smart SQ 2.0 Smartwatch
vs
Garett Prime Smartwatch Herren, Edelstahl, Gorilla GlassvsMotorola Moto Watch
vs
HiFuture Active Smartwatch 1,43" AMOLEDvsMotorola Moto Watch
vs
Zeblaze GTR 3 ProvsMotorola Moto Watch7.47.2

