vs
2.8Display3.3
3.9Smart features6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
105 (2022)105 4G (2023)
| 105 (2022) | 105 4G (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 115.2 mm | 121.5 mm | −6.3 mm |
| Width | 49.9 mm | 50 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 14.3 mm | 14.4 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 70 g | 93 g | −23 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 105 (2022) better than 105 4G (2023)?
- Weight70 g vs 93 g+33%
Why is 105 4G (2023) better than 105 (2022)?
- LTE (cellular)No · 105 (2022): Yes
- Battery capacity800 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+81%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 70 g | 93 g |
| Thickness | 14.3 mm | 14.4 mm |
| Height | 115.2 mm | 121.5 mm |
| Width | 49.9 mm | 50 mm |
| Colours | Blue, Charcoal | Charcoal, Ocean Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.77″ | 1.8″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 120 px | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 113 ppi | 111 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 800 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| RAM | 0.004 GB | — |
| Platform | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6261D | — |
