Dimensions
Size comparison
105 4G110 4G
| 105 4G | 110 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 121 mm | 121 mm | = |
| Width | 50 mm | 50 mm | = |
| Thickness | 14.5 mm | 14.5 mm | = |
| Weight | 80 g | 84 g | −4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 105 4G better than 110 4G?
- Weight80.2 g vs 84.5 g+5%
Why is 110 4G better than 105 4G?
110 4G has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 80.2 g | 84.5 g |
| Thickness | 14.5 mm | 14.5 mm |
| Height | 121 mm | 121 mm |
| Width | 50 mm | 50 mm |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Red | Yellow, Aqua, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.8″ | 1.8″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 120 px | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 111 ppi | 111 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,020 mAh | 1,020 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| RAM | 0.1 GB | 0.1 GB |
