vs
3.3Display7.5
3.9Smart features3.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
106 (2023)BT10
| 106 (2023) | BT10 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 115.1 mm | 48.7 mm | +66.4 mm |
| Width | 49.4 mm | 48.7 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 14.5 mm | 12.6 mm | +1.9 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 106 (2023) better than BT10?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 410 mAh2.4×
- Screen size1.8″ vs 1.43″+26%
Why is BT10 better than 106 (2023)?
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · 106 (2023): Yes
- Resolution (width)120 px vs 466 px3.9×
- Pixel density111 ppi vs 326 ppi2.9×
- Thickness14.5 mm vs 12.6 mm+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 49 mm |
| Weight | 79.4 g | — |
| Thickness | 14.5 mm | 12.6 mm |
| Height | 115.1 mm | 48.7 mm |
| Width | 49.4 mm | 48.7 mm |
| Water resistance | — | 5 ATM |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Military-grade (MIL-STD-810) | — | Yes |
| Colours | Red Terracotta, Emerald Green, Charcoal | Black, Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.8″ | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | TFT LCD | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 120 px | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 466 px |
| Pixel density | 111 ppi | 326 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 410 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | — | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sensors | — | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
