vs
3.3Display8.8
3.9Smart features3.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
106 (2023)BT80
| 106 (2023) | BT80 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 115.1 mm | 52.7 mm | +62.4 mm |
| Width | 49.4 mm | 44.5 mm | +4.9 mm |
| Thickness | 14.5 mm | 14.2 mm | +0.3 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 106 (2023) better than BT80?
106 (2023) has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is BT80 better than 106 (2023)?
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · 106 (2023): Yes
- Resolution (width)120 px vs 410 px3.4×
- Pixel density111 ppi vs 304 ppi2.7×
- Screen size1.8″ vs 2.13″+18%
- Thickness14.5 mm vs 14.2 mm+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 53 mm |
| Weight | 79.4 g | — |
| Thickness | 14.5 mm | 14.2 mm |
| Height | 115.1 mm | 52.7 mm |
| Width | 49.4 mm | 44.5 mm |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Tempered glass |
| Water resistance | — | 2 ATM |
| Colours | Red Terracotta, Emerald Green, Charcoal | Black, Titanium |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.8″ | 2.13″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | TFT LCD | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 120 px | 410 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 502 px |
| Pixel density | 111 ppi | 304 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | — | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sensors | — | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2, blood pressure, barometer, compass |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Barometric altimeter | — | Yes |
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
