vs
4.0Display4.6
6.5Smart features3.9
Why is 110 4G (2024) better than Watch S2?
- LTE (cellular)Yes · Watch S2: No
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 380 mAh2.6×
- Screen size2″ vs 1.43″+40%
Why is Watch S2 better than 110 4G (2024)?
- Built-in GPSNo · 110 4G (2024): Yes
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · 110 4G (2024): Yes
- Resolution (width)240 px vs 466 px+94%
- Pixel density200 ppi vs 326 ppi+63%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 46 mm |
| Weight | — | 41 g |
| Thickness | — | 11 mm |
| Height | — | 46.5 mm |
| Width | — | 46.5 mm |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Scratch-resistant glass |
| Water resistance | — | 5 ATM |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | Blue, Titanium | Gray, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2″ | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | TFT LCD | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 466 px |
| Pixel density | 200 ppi | 326 ppi |
| Peak brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 380 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | — | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sensors | — | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| RAM | 0.1 GB | — |
