Nothing CMF Watch Pro 3 vs Vivo Watch GT 2

What CMF Watch Pro 3 does better (1) and where Watch GT 2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

6.8Score

1 advantage≈ $70

Vivo · 2025Watch GT 2

7.1Score

2 advantages≈ $95

Higher score

5.9Display9.5

5.0Health tracking5.0

Dimensions

Size comparison

CMF Watch Pro 3Watch GT 2

	CMF Watch Pro 3	Watch GT 2	Difference
Case size	47 mm	40.2 mm	+6.8 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Specifications

Only differences	Nothing CMF Watch Pro 3≈ $706.8	Vivo Watch GT 2≈ $957.1
Design & durability
Case size	47 mm	48 mm
Weight	—	34.8 g
Thickness	—	11 mm
Height	—	47.5 mm
Width	—	40.2 mm
Case material	Aluminium	Aluminium
Strap material	Silikon	—
Water resistance	—	2 ATM
Colours	—	Glossy Black (eSIM only), Matte Silver, Matte Dark Blue
Display
Screen size	1.43″	2.07″
Display technology	AMOLED	AMOLED
Panel	AMOLED	AMOLED
AMOLED / OLED display	Yes	Yes
Always-on display	Yes	—
Touchscreen	Yes	—
Resolution (width)	466 px	432 px
Resolution (height)	466 px	514 px
Pixel density	—	324 ppi
Peak brightness	—	2,400 nits
Refresh rate	—	60 Hz
Battery
Battery life (smartwatch mode)	10 days	—
Battery capacity	350 mAh	595 mAh
Health sensors
Optical heart rate	Yes	Yes
Blood oxygen (SpO2)	Yes	Yes
ECG	Yes	—
Sensors	heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer, ambient light	Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, compass, SpO2
Sports & navigation
Built-in GPS	Yes	Yes
Satellite systems	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Compass	—	Yes
Connectivity
NFC payments	—	Yes
LTE (cellular)	—	Yes
eSIM	—	Yes
Bluetooth	5.3	5.4
Smart features
Speaker	—	Yes
Platform
Operating system	CMF Watch App	Blue OS 3.0
Platform	Proprietary	Proprietary
Works with	iOS, Android	—