Why is BT101 better than Watch 5?
- Screen size2.02″ vs 1.97″+3%
Why is Watch 5 better than BT101?
- Built-in GPSNo · BT101: Yes
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · BT101: Yes
- NFC paymentsNo · BT101: Yes
- Resolution (width)320 px vs 390 px+22%
- Pixel density250 ppi vs 302 ppi+21%
- Battery capacity410 mAh vs 460 mAh+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 58 mm | — |
| Thickness | 13.3 mm | — |
| Height | 58.3 mm | — |
| Width | 46.1 mm | — |
| Case material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Lens / cover glass | Tempered glass | — |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Water resistance | 1 ATM | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Water rating (maker) | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM | — |
| Colours | Black | Black, Titanium |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.02″ | 1.97″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | TFT LCD | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 320 px | 390 px |
| Resolution (height) | 390 px | 450 px |
| Pixel density | 250 ppi | 302 ppi |
| Peak brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 7 days | — |
| Battery capacity | 410 mAh | 460 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2, blood pressure, barometer, compass | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2, compass |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Barometric altimeter | Yes | — |
| Compass | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | Yes |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
