NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. BT50 vs Galaxy Watch FE

Oukitel BT50 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch FE

What BT50 does better (3) and where Galaxy Watch FE wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Oukitel BT50
Oukitel · 2024BT50
4.6Score
3 advantages≈ $110
vs
Samsung Galaxy Watch FE
Samsung · 2024Galaxy Watch FE
8.3Score
7 advantages≈ $110
Higher score
4.6Display5.9
5.0Health tracking5.0
3.9Smart features7.9
2.2Build & durability8.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

BT50Galaxy Watch FE
51.2 × 51.21339.3 × 40.49.8
BT50Galaxy Watch FEDifference
Height51.2 mm40.4 mm+10.8 mm
Width51.2 mm39.3 mm+11.9 mm
Thickness13 mm9.8 mm+3.2 mm
Weight76 g27 g+49 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is BT50 better than Galaxy Watch FE?

  1. Screen size1.43″ vs 1.2″+19%
  2. Battery capacity400 mAh vs 247 mAh+62%
  3. Resolution (width)466 px vs 396 px+18%

Why is Galaxy Watch FE better than BT50?

  1. Built-in GPSNo · BT50: Yes
  2. Weight76 g vs 26.6 g2.9×
  3. Water resistance1 ATM vs 5 ATM5×
  4. NFC paymentsNo · BT50: Yes
  5. LTE (cellular)No · BT50: Yes
  6. eSIMNo · BT50: Yes
  7. Thickness13 mm vs 9.8 mm+33%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare