Dimensions
Size comparison
BT10BT50
| BT10 | BT50 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 48.7 mm | 51.2 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Width | 48.7 mm | 51.2 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Thickness | 12.6 mm | 13 mm | −0.4 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is BT10 better than BT50?
- Water resistance5 ATM vs 1 ATM5×
- Thickness12.6 mm vs 13 mm+3%
- Battery capacity410 mAh vs 400 mAh+2%
Why is BT50 better than BT10?
BT50 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 49 mm | 51 mm |
| Weight | — | 76 g |
| Thickness | 12.6 mm | 13 mm |
| Height | 48.7 mm | 51.2 mm |
| Width | 48.7 mm | 51.2 mm |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 1 ATM |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Military-grade (MIL-STD-810) | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black, Orange | Silver, Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.43″ | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 466 px | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | 466 px | 466 px |
| Pixel density | 326 ppi | 326 ppi |
| Peak brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 410 mAh | 400 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
