Dimensions
Size comparison
BT10BT80
| BT10 | BT80 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 48.7 mm | 52.7 mm | −4 mm |
| Width | 48.7 mm | 44.5 mm | +4.2 mm |
| Thickness | 12.6 mm | 14.2 mm | −1.6 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is BT10 better than BT80?
- Water resistance5 ATM vs 2 ATM2.5×
- Resolution (width)466 px vs 410 px+14%
- Thickness12.6 mm vs 14.2 mm+13%
- Pixel density326 ppi vs 304 ppi+7%
Why is BT80 better than BT10?
- Screen size1.43″ vs 2.13″+49%
- Battery capacity410 mAh vs 1,000 mAh2.4×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 49 mm | 53 mm |
| Thickness | 12.6 mm | 14.2 mm |
| Height | 48.7 mm | 52.7 mm |
| Width | 48.7 mm | 44.5 mm |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Tempered glass |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 2 ATM |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Military-grade (MIL-STD-810) | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black, Orange | Black, Titanium |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.43″ | 2.13″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 466 px | 410 px |
| Resolution (height) | 466 px | 502 px |
| Pixel density | 326 ppi | 304 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 410 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2, blood pressure, barometer, compass |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Barometric altimeter | — | Yes |
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
