Dimensions
Size comparison
BT10BT103
| BT10 | BT103 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 48.7 mm | 49.5 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Width | 48.7 mm | 40 mm | +8.7 mm |
| Thickness | 12.6 mm | 10.9 mm | +1.7 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is BT10 better than BT103?
- AMOLED / OLED displayYes · BT103: No
- SpeakerYes · BT103: No
- Resolution (width)466 px vs 320 px+46%
- Battery capacity410 mAh vs 300 mAh+37%
- Pixel density326 ppi vs 260 ppi+25%
Why is BT103 better than BT10?
- Screen size1.43″ vs 1.91″+34%
- Thickness12.6 mm vs 10.9 mm+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 49 mm | 50 mm |
| Weight | — | 100 g |
| Thickness | 12.6 mm | 10.9 mm |
| Height | 48.7 mm | 49.5 mm |
| Width | 48.7 mm | 40 mm |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Tempered glass |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Military-grade (MIL-STD-810) | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black, Orange | Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.43″ | 1.91″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | LCD |
| Panel | AMOLED | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 466 px | 320 px |
| Resolution (height) | 466 px | 380 px |
| Pixel density | 326 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 410 mAh | 300 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | No |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
