NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pacer vs 5 PEAK

Polar Pacer vs Suunto 5 PEAK

What Pacer does better (5) and where 5 PEAK wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Polar Pacer
Polar · 2022Pacer
3.7Score
5 advantages≈ $260
Higher score
vs
Suunto 5 PEAK
Suunto · 20225 PEAK
3.5Score
2 advantages≈ $170
2.3Display2.0
3.5Battery life2.3
2.0Sports & outdoor2.3
4.3Build & durability2.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pacer5 PEAK
45 × 4511.543 × 4312.9
Pacer5 PEAKDifference
Height45 mm43 mm+2 mm
Width45 mm43 mm+2 mm
Thickness11.5 mm12.9 mm−1.4 mm
Weight40 g39 g+1 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pacer better than 5 PEAK?

  1. GPS battery life32 h vs 20 h+60%
  2. Water resistance5 ATM vs 3 ATM+67%
  3. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.1″+9%
  4. Thickness11.5 mm vs 12.9 mm+12%
  5. Resolution (width)240 px vs 218 px+10%

Why is 5 PEAK better than Pacer?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)6.5 days vs 7 days+8%
  2. Weight40 g vs 39 g+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare