NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pacer vs Race S

Polar Pacer vs Suunto Race S

What Pacer does better (1) and where Race S wins (10) — every spec side by side.

Polar Pacer
Polar · 2022Pacer
3.7Score
1 advantage≈ $260
vs
Suunto Race S
Suunto · 2024Race S
6.1Score
10 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
2.3Display4.8
3.5Battery life4.6
2.1Health tracking4.9
2.0Sports & outdoor6.4
4.3Build & durability9.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

PacerRace S
45 × 4511.545 × 4511.4
PacerRace SDifference
Height45 mm45 mm=
Width45 mm45 mm=
Thickness11.5 mm11.4 mm+0.1 mm
Weight40 g53 g−13 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pacer better than Race S?

  1. Weight40 g vs 53 g+32%

Why is Race S better than Pacer?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)6.5 days vs 9 days+38%
  2. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  3. Offline mapsNo · Pacer: Yes
  4. GPS battery life32 h vs 40 h+25%
  5. TouchscreenNo · Pacer: Yes
  6. Barometric altimeterNo · Pacer: Yes
  7. CompassNo · Pacer: Yes
  8. Resolution (width)240 px vs 466 px+94%
  9. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.32″+10%
  10. Pixel density200 ppi vs 353 ppi+76%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare