vs
2.5Display2.2
5.0Health tracking5.0
3.9Smart features2.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Watch 3Watch Live
| Watch 3 | Watch Live | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 45 mm | 40.6 mm | +4.4 mm |
| Width | 37 mm | 34.6 mm | +2.4 mm |
| Thickness | 11.5 mm | 10.8 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 40 g | 36 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Watch 3 better than Watch Live?
- Screen size1.8″ vs 1.3″+38%
- SpeakerYes · Watch Live: No
Why is Watch Live better than Watch 3?
- Weight40 g vs 35.7 g+12%
- Pixel density207 ppi vs 261 ppi+26%
- Thickness11.5 mm vs 10.8 mm+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 45 mm | 41 mm |
| Weight | 40 g | 35.7 g |
| Thickness | 11.5 mm | 10.8 mm |
| Height | 45 mm | 40.6 mm |
| Width | 37 mm | 34.6 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | Plastic / polymer |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Colours | Black, Gray | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.8″ | 1.3″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 286 px | 240 px |
| Pixel density | 207 ppi | 261 ppi |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 340 mAh | — |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 4.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | No |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
