vs
7.7Display7.5
4.9Smart features6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Watch T1Watch S1 Active
| Watch T1 | Watch S1 Active | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 43.5 mm | 46.5 mm | −3 mm |
| Width | 43.5 mm | 47.3 mm | −3.8 mm |
| Thickness | 10.2 mm | 11 mm | −0.8 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Watch T1 better than Watch S1 Active?
- Pixel density453 ppi vs 326 ppi+39%
- Thickness10.2 mm vs 11 mm+8%
Why is Watch S1 Active better than Watch T1?
- Battery capacity228 mAh vs 470 mAh2.1×
- SpeakerNo · Watch T1: Yes
- Screen size1.3″ vs 1.43″+10%
- Resolution (width)416 px vs 466 px+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 44 mm | 46 mm |
| Thickness | 10.2 mm | 11 mm |
| Height | 43.5 mm | 46.5 mm |
| Width | 43.5 mm | 47.3 mm |
| Case material | — | Aluminium |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Colours | Black | Moon White, Space Black, Ocean Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.3″ | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 416 px | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | 416 px | 466 px |
| Pixel density | 453 ppi | 326 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 228 mAh | 470 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate | Accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Barometric altimeter | — | Yes |
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | Yes | Yes |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | No | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
