Dimensions
Size comparison
Watch T1Watch GT
| Watch T1 | Watch GT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 43.5 mm | 47.8 mm | −4.3 mm |
| Width | 43.5 mm | 46.4 mm | −2.9 mm |
| Thickness | 10.2 mm | 12.4 mm | −2.2 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Watch T1 better than Watch GT?
- NFC paymentsYes · Watch GT: No
- Pixel density453 ppi vs 326 ppi+39%
- Thickness10.2 mm vs 12.4 mm+22%
Why is Watch GT better than Watch T1?
- Battery capacity228 mAh vs 420 mAh+84%
- Screen size1.3″ vs 1.39″+7%
- Resolution (width)416 px vs 454 px+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 44 mm | 48 mm |
| Weight | — | 30 g |
| Thickness | 10.2 mm | 12.4 mm |
| Height | 43.5 mm | 47.8 mm |
| Width | 43.5 mm | 46.4 mm |
| Case material | — | Aluminium |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | Black | Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.3″ | 1.39″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 416 px | 454 px |
| Resolution (height) | 416 px | 454 px |
| Pixel density | 453 ppi | 326 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 228 mAh | 420 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | Yes | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | No | No |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
