NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Galaxy Watch4 Classic vs Poco Watch

Samsung Galaxy Watch4 Classic vs Xiaomi Poco Watch

What Galaxy Watch4 Classic does better (6) and where Poco Watch wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Samsung Galaxy Watch4 Classic
Samsung · 2021Galaxy Watch4 Classic
6.2Score
6 advantages≈ $95
vs
Xiaomi Poco Watch
Xiaomi · 2022Poco Watch
7.1Score
4 advantages≈ $95
Higher score
5.3Display6.1
5.0Health tracking5.0
6.4Sports & outdoor8.0
8.4Smart features4.9
3.9Build & durability8.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy Watch4 ClassicPoco Watch
45.5 × 45.51134.4 × 39.110
Galaxy Watch4 ClassicPoco WatchDifference
Height45.5 mm39.1 mm+6.4 mm
Width45.5 mm34.4 mm+11.1 mm
Thickness11 mm10 mm+1 mm
Weight52 g31 g+21 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy Watch4 Classic better than Poco Watch?

  1. LTE (cellular)Yes · Poco Watch: No
  2. eSIMYes · Poco Watch: No
  3. SpeakerYes · Poco Watch: No
  4. Battery capacity361 mAh vs 225 mAh+60%
  5. Resolution (width)450 px vs 320 px+41%
  6. Pixel density321 ppi vs 301 ppi+7%

Why is Poco Watch better than Galaxy Watch4 Classic?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)1.7 days vs 14 days8.2×
  2. Weight52 g vs 31 g+68%
  3. Screen size1.4″ vs 1.6″+14%
  4. Thickness11 mm vs 10 mm+10%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare