NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Galaxy Watch8 Classic vs Redmi Watch 3 Active

Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Classic vs Xiaomi Redmi Watch 3 Active

What Galaxy Watch8 Classic does better (10) and where Redmi Watch 3 Active wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Classic
Samsung · 2025Galaxy Watch8 Classic
8.3Score
10 advantages≈ $280
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Watch 3 Active
Xiaomi · 2023Redmi Watch 3 Active
5.3Score
2 advantages≈ $55
9.1Display3.6
8.2Health tracking5.0
7.9Smart features5.1
4.4Build & durability4.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy Watch8 ClassicRedmi Watch 3 Active
46 × 46.410.638.9 × 46.910.9
Galaxy Watch8 ClassicRedmi Watch 3 ActiveDifference
Height46.4 mm46.9 mm−0.5 mm
Width46 mm38.9 mm+7.1 mm
Thickness10.6 mm10.9 mm−0.3 mm
Weight64 g42 g+22 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy Watch8 Classic better than Redmi Watch 3 Active?

  1. Built-in GPSYes · Redmi Watch 3 Active: No
  2. Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 450 nits6.7×
  3. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Redmi Watch 3 Active: No
  4. LTE (cellular)Yes · Redmi Watch 3 Active: No
  5. Wi-FiWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 14×
  6. eSIMYes · Redmi Watch 3 Active: No
  7. Resolution (width)438 px vs 240 px+82%
  8. Pixel density327 ppi vs 202 ppi+62%
  9. Battery capacity445 mAh vs 289 mAh+54%
  10. Thickness10.6 mm vs 10.9 mm+3%

Why is Redmi Watch 3 Active better than Galaxy Watch8 Classic?

  1. Weight63.5 g vs 42 g+51%
  2. Screen size1.34″ vs 1.83″+37%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare