vs
3.6Display7.5
5.0Health tracking5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
2.0 SW033Watch S1 Active
| 2.0 SW033 | Watch S1 Active | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 45 mm | 47.3 mm | −2.3 mm |
| Thickness | 10.4 mm | 11 mm | −0.6 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 2.0 SW033 better than Watch S1 Active?
- Screen size1.7″ vs 1.43″+19%
- Thickness10.4 mm vs 11 mm+6%
Why is Watch S1 Active better than 2.0 SW033?
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · 2.0 SW033: Yes
- Battery capacity200 mAh vs 470 mAh2.4×
- Resolution (width)240 px vs 466 px+94%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 45 mm | 46 mm |
| Thickness | 10.4 mm | 11 mm |
| Height | — | 46.5 mm |
| Width | — | 47.3 mm |
| Case material | — | Aluminium |
| Lens / cover glass | Mineralglas | — |
| Water resistance | — | 5 ATM |
| Colours | — | Moon White, Space Black, Ocean Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.7″ | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | — | AMOLED |
| Panel | — | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | 280 px | 466 px |
| Pixel density | — | 326 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 5 days | — |
| Battery capacity | 200 mAh | 470 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | Accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Barometric altimeter | — | Yes |
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | Yes |
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS | — |
