vs
6.2Display3.6
4.9Health tracking4.9
Why is XIN100101 better than Btalk 3 Plus Smartwatch?
- AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Btalk 3 Plus Smartwatch: No
Why is Btalk 3 Plus Smartwatch better than XIN100101?
- Screen size1.3″ vs 1.39″+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 46 mm |
| Lens / cover glass | — | 2.5D-Glas |
| Strap material | — | Silikon |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.3″ | 1.39″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | — |
| Panel | Farbdisplay | IPS |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | No |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 360 px | 360 px |
| Resolution (height) | 360 px | 360 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 260 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | Android | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Xoro XIN100101vsPeers Hardy Series 29 AMOLED Smart Calling Watchvs
Xoro XIN100101vsDenver SWC-184RO Smartwatch 1,8" IPS Full-Touchvs
Xoro XIN100101vsReflex RA08-2118 Series 8 Activity Trackervs
Xoro XIN100101vsRadley RYS08vs
Xoro XIN100101vsRadley RYS08-2088
vsZeblaze Btalk 3 Plus SmartwatchvsPeers Hardy Series 29 AMOLED Smart Calling Watch