vs
6.2Display8.1
4.9Health tracking4.9
Why is XIN100101 better than Btalk 3 Pro Smartwatch 1,43" AMOLED grau IP68?
XIN100101 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Btalk 3 Pro Smartwatch 1,43" AMOLED grau IP68 better than XIN100101?
- Screen size1.3″ vs 1.43″+10%
- Resolution (width)360 px vs 466 px+29%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 38 mm |
| Case material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Strap material | — | Silikon |
| Colours | Black | Grey, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.3″ | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | Farbdisplay | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 360 px | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | 360 px | 466 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 260 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | Android | iOS, Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Xoro XIN100101vsPeers Hardy Series 29 AMOLED Smart Calling Watch
vs
Xoro XIN100101vsDenver SWC-184RO Smartwatch 1,8" IPS Full-Touch
vs
Xoro XIN100101vsReflex RA08-2118 Series 8 Activity Tracker
vs
Xoro XIN100101vsRadley RYS08-2088
vs
Xoro XIN100101vsRadley RYS08
vs
Zeblaze Btalk 3 Pro Smartwatch 1,43" AMOLED grau IP68vsPeers Hardy Series 29 AMOLED Smart Calling Watch
