vs
9.7Display4.0
4.9Health tracking4.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
GTS 4Z-Watch Active
| GTS 4 | Z-Watch Active | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 47 mm | 39 mm | +8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 12 mm | −3.3 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GTS 4 better than Z-Watch Active?
- AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Z-Watch Active: No
- Resolution (width)466 px vs 240 px+94%
- Thickness8.7 mm vs 12 mm+38%
Why is Z-Watch Active better than GTS 4?
- Battery capacity260 mAh vs 600 mAh2.3×
- Screen size1.94″ vs 2.01″+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 47 mm | 48 mm |
| Weight | — | 45 g |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 12 mm |
| Height | — | 48.3 mm |
| Width | — | 39 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | Plastic / polymer |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | — | Black, Gold, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.94″ | 2.01″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | LCD |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 466 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 466 px | 296 px |
| Pixel density | — | 190 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 7 days | — |
| Battery capacity | 260 mAh | 600 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | No |
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Zeed WatchOS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
