NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Smartwatches
  3. Bea-Fon Watch 102
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to Bea-Fon Watch 102

10 fitness bands at a similar price that compete with the Watch 102 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Bea-Fon Watch 102
Bea-Fon · 2025
Watch 102
1.83″4 days
approx. price≈ $35
9.6

Alternatives to the Watch 102

Bea-Fon Watch 101
1
Bea-Fon · 2025Watch 101
9.5
42% pricier ≈ $50
  • Battery life (smartwatch mode) 7 days vs 4 days
  • Battery capacity 300 mAh vs 250 mAh
Huawei Band 11
2
Huawei · 2026Band 11
9.1
19% pricier ≈ $45
  • Battery life (smartwatch mode) 14 days vs 4 days
  • Battery capacity 300 mAh vs 250 mAh
  • Screen size 1.62″ vs 1.83″
Huawei Band 10
3
Huawei · 2025Band 10
8.6
25% cheaper ≈ $25
  • Battery life (smartwatch mode) 8 days vs 4 days
  • Screen size 1.47″ vs 1.83″
  • Battery capacity 180 mAh vs 250 mAh
Ice Watch Fit 1.0
5
Ice Watch · 2025Fit 1.0
9.4
111% pricier ≈ $75
  • Battery life (smartwatch mode) 5 days vs 4 days
  • Screen size 1.78″ vs 1.83″
Amazfit Helio Core
7
Amazfit · 2025Helio Core
94% pricier ≈ $70
  • Battery life (smartwatch mode) 10 days vs 4 days
  • Built-in GPS
  • Battery capacity 232 mAh vs 250 mAh
Nilox ONAIR
8
Nilox · 2026ONAIR
Same price ≈ $35
  • Battery life (smartwatch mode) 25 days vs 4 days
  • AMOLED / OLED display
  • Battery capacity 180 mAh vs 250 mAh
Xiaomi Smart Band 10
9
Xiaomi · 2025Smart Band 10
7.2
36% pricier ≈ $50
  • Battery life (smartwatch mode) 9 days vs 4 days
  • Screen size 1.72″ vs 1.83″
  • Battery capacity 233 mAh vs 250 mAh
Huawei Band 11 Pro
10
Huawei · 2026Band 11 Pro
8.9
81% pricier ≈ $65
  • Battery life (smartwatch mode) 14 days vs 4 days
  • Battery capacity 300 mAh vs 250 mAh
  • Screen size 1.62″ vs 1.83″
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare