NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Smartwatches
  3. Cubot GT3
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to Cubot GT3

10 smartwatches at a similar price that compete with the GT3 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Alternatives to the GT3

Xiaomi Watch 5
1
Xiaomi · 2025Watch 5
7.7
≈ $170
  • NFC payments
  • LTE (cellular)
  • eSIM
  • Screen size 1.54″ vs 1.96″
  • Pixel density 312 ppi vs 331 ppi
Huawei Watch GT 6 Pro
2
Huawei · 2025Watch GT 6 Pro
7.8
≈ $310
  • NFC payments
  • Weight 54.7 g vs 57 g
  • Battery capacity 867 mAh vs 530 mAh
  • Screen size 1.47″ vs 1.96″
  • Pixel density 317 ppi vs 331 ppi
OnePlus Watch 3
3
OnePlus · 2025Watch 3
6.9
≈ $170
  • NFC payments
  • Weight 49.7 g vs 57 g
  • Battery capacity 648 mAh vs 530 mAh
  • Screen size 1.5″ vs 1.96″
  • Pixel density 310 ppi vs 331 ppi
Huawei Watch 5
4
Huawei · 2025Watch 5
8.3
≈ $290
  • NFC payments
  • LTE (cellular)
  • eSIM
  • Screen size 1.5″ vs 1.96″
  • Weight 63 g vs 57 g
Huawei Watch GT 6
6
Huawei · 2025Watch GT 6
7.6
≈ $280
  • NFC payments
  • Weight 51.3 g vs 57 g
  • Battery capacity 867 mAh vs 530 mAh
  • Screen size 1.47″ vs 1.96″
  • Pixel density 317 ppi vs 331 ppi
OPPO Watch X2
7
OPPO · 2025Watch X2
7.0
≈ $320
  • NFC payments
  • Weight 49.7 g vs 57 g
  • Battery capacity 648 mAh vs 530 mAh
  • Screen size 1.5″ vs 1.96″
  • Pixel density 310 ppi vs 331 ppi
Honor Watch 5 Pro
9
Honor · 2025Watch 5 Pro
8.1
≈ $180
  • NFC payments
  • LTE (cellular)
  • eSIM
  • Screen size 1.5″ vs 1.96″
  • Pixel density 310 ppi vs 331 ppi
Samsung Galaxy Watch8
10
Samsung · 2025Galaxy Watch8
6.6
≈ $310
  • NFC payments
  • LTE (cellular)
  • Weight 34 g vs 57 g
  • Screen size 1.47″ vs 1.96″
  • Battery capacity 435 mAh vs 530 mAh
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare