NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. GT3 vs Galaxy Watch8 Classic

Cubot GT3 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Classic

What GT3 does better (3) and where Galaxy Watch8 Classic wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Cubot GT3
Cubot · 2025GT3
6.5Score
3 advantages
vs
Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Classic
Samsung · 2025Galaxy Watch8 Classic
8.3Score
5 advantages≈ $280
Higher score
9.8Display9.1
5.0Health tracking8.2
4.7Sports & outdoor3.1
3.9Smart features7.9
3.2Build & durability4.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

GT3Galaxy Watch8 Classic
48.2 × 59.313.446 × 46.410.6
GT3Galaxy Watch8 ClassicDifference
Height59.3 mm46.4 mm+12.9 mm
Width48.2 mm46 mm+2.2 mm
Thickness13.4 mm10.6 mm+2.8 mm
Weight57 g64 g−6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is GT3 better than Galaxy Watch8 Classic?

  1. Screen size1.96″ vs 1.34″+46%
  2. Weight57 g vs 63.5 g+11%
  3. Battery capacity530 mAh vs 445 mAh+19%

Why is Galaxy Watch8 Classic better than GT3?

  1. NFC paymentsNo · GT3: Yes
  2. LTE (cellular)No · GT3: Yes
  3. eSIMNo · GT3: Yes
  4. Thickness13.4 mm vs 10.6 mm+26%
  5. Resolution (width)410 px vs 438 px+7%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare