vs
4.6Display9.1
5.5Health tracking5.5
Why is Fit Touch 3 better than Watch 102?
Fit Touch 3 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Watch 102 better than Fit Touch 3?
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Fit Touch 3: Yes
- Battery capacity230 mAh vs 250 mAh+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 48 g | — |
| Case material | Aluminium | — |
| Strap material | — | Silikon |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.83″ | 1.83″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | TFT | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 4 days |
| Battery capacity | 230 mAh | 250 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
